::page 135::
STUDY VI
THE WORK OF HARVEST
Character of the Harvest Work--Gathering the Wheat--Bundling and Binding and Burning the Tares--Their Origin and Prolific Growth-- Consumed Like the Chaff of the Jewish Harvest--Time Correspondencies Noted--The Casting off, Gradual Fall and Final Destruction of Babylon--The Sealing of the Servants of God Before the Plagues Come upon Babylon--Judgment or Trial, Both as Systems and Individually --The Test of the Jewish System Typical--The Testing and Sifting of the Wheat--The Wise, Separated from the Foolish Virgins, Go in to the Feast--"And the Door was Shut"--A Further Inspection, and the Casting Out of Some--Why? and How?--The Close of the "High Calling"--The Time is Short--"Let no Man Take Thy Crown"--Eleventh Hour Servants and Overcomers.
"HARVEST" is a term which gives a general idea as to what work should be
expected to transpire between the dates 1874 and 1914. It is a time of reaping rather than
of sowing, a time of testing, of reckoning, of settlement and of rewarding. The harvest of
the Jewish age being a type of the harvest of this age, observation and comparison of the
various features of that harvest afford very clear ideas concerning the work to be
accomplished in the present harvest. In that harvest, our Lord's special teachings were
such as to gather the wheat, who were such already, and to separate the chaff of the
Jewish nation from the wheat. And his doctrines became also the seeds for the new
dispensation, which opened (shortly after the nation of Israel was cast off) at Pentecost.
Our Lord's words to his disciples as he sent them forth, during his ministry
to that church-nation, should be carefully
::page 136::
remembered, as giving proof that their special work then was reaping, and not sowing. He
said to them, "Lift up your eyes and look on the fields; for they are white already
to harvest: and he that reapeth receiveth wages, and gathereth fruit unto life
eternal." (`John 4:35,36`) As the chief reaper in that harvest (as he also is in this
one), the Lord said to the under-reapers, "I sent you to reap that whereon ye
bestowed no labor: other men [the patriarchs and prophets and other holy men of old]
labored, and ye are entered into their labors"--to reap the fruits of those centuries
of effort, and to test that people by the message, "The Kingdom of heaven is at
hand," and the King is present--"Behold, thy King cometh unto thee." `Matt.
10:7`; `John 12:15`; `Zech. 9:9`
In the Jewish harvest, the Lord, rather than to make goats into sheep, sought
the blinded and scattered sheep of Israel, calling for all who already were his sheep,
that they might hear his voice and follow him. These observations of the type furnish an
intimation of the character of the work due in the present harvest or reaping time.
Another and a larger sowing, under the more favorable conditions of the Millennial age and
Kingdom, will soon be commenced: indeed, the seeds of truth concerning restitution, etc.,
which will produce that coming crop, are even now being dropped here and there into
longing, truth-hungry hearts. But this is only an incidental work now; for, like its
Jewish type, the present harvest is a time for reaping the professed church (so-called
Christendom), that the true saints gathered out of it may be exalted and associated with
their Lord, not only to preach the truth, but also to put into operation the great work of
restitution for the world.
In this harvest, wheat and tares are to be separated; yet both of these
classes, previous to the separation, compose the nominal church. The wheat are the true
children of the
::page 137::
Kingdom, the truly consecrated, the heirs, while the tares are nominally, but not really,
Christ's Church or prospective bride. The tares are the class mentioned by our Lord, who
call him Lord, but who do not obey him. (`Luke 6:46`) In outward appearance, the two
classes are often so much alike as to require close scrutiny to distinguish between them.
"The field is the world," in the parable, and the wheat and tares together (the
tares more numerous) constitute what is sometimes called "The Christian World,"
and "Christendom." By attending religious services occasionally or regularly, by
calling themselves Christians, by following certain rites and ceremonies, and by being
identified more or less directly with some religious system, the tares look like, and
sometimes pass for, God's heart-consecrated children. In so-called "Christian
lands," all except professed Infidels and Jews are thus counted Christians; and their
numbers (including the few fully consecrated ones--the saints) are estimated at about one
hundred and eighty millions of Greek and Roman Catholics, and about one hundred and twenty
millions of Protestants.
During the Gospel age, our Lord's instructions have been not to attempt a
separation of the true from the imitation children of the Kingdom; because to accomplish a
complete separation would occasion the general turning of the world (the field) upside
down--a general unsettlement of the wheat, as well as of the tares. He therefore said,
"Let both grow together until the harvest." But he added, "In the time of
harvest I will say unto the reapers [angels, messengers], Gather ye together first the
tares and bind them in bundles to burn them, but gather the wheat into my barn."
(`Matt. 13:30`) Hence, in the time of harvest we must expect a general separating work,
hitherto prohibited. While those symbolized by the wheat are ever encouraged to stand fast
in the liberty wherewith Christ made them free, and to
::page 138::
avoid entangling alliances with open transgressors and with wolves in sheep's clothing,
yet they were not to attempt to draw the line between the fully consecrated class
(the wheat, the saints), and the tares who profess Christ's name and doctrines,
and who to some extent allow these doctrines to influence their outward conduct, but whose
heart desires are far from the Lord and his service. This judging of hearts, motives,
etc., which is beyond our power, and which the Lord commanded us to entirely avoid, is the
very thing which the various sects have all along endeavored to accomplish; attempting to
separate, to test the wheat, and to keep out as tares or heretics, by rigorous creeds of
human manufacture, all professors of Christianity whose faith did not exactly fit their
various false measurements. Yet how unsuccessful all these sects have been! They have set
up false, unscriptural standards and doctrines, which have really developed many tares and
choked and separated the wheat; for instance, the doctrine of the everlasting torment of
all not members of the Church. Though now becoming greatly modified, under the increasing
light of our day, what a multitude of tares this error has produced, and how it has choked
and blinded and hindered the wheat from a proper recognition of God's character and plan.
Today we see what a mistake the various sects have made in not following the Lord's
counsel, to let wheat and tares, saints and professors, grow together, without
attempting a separation. Honest men in every sect will admit that in their sects are many
tares, professors not saints, and that outside their sectarian bars are many saints. Thus,
no sect today either can or does claim to be all wheat, and free from
tares. Much less would any earthly organization (except Christadelphians and Mormons) be
bold enough to claim that it contained all of the wheat. Hence, they are without
any excuse for their organizations, theological fences, etc. They do not separate
::page 139::
wheat from tares, nor can anything completely and thoroughly accomplish this separation of
hearts except the method which the Lord has ordained shall be put into execution in the
time of harvest. This shows the necessity for knowing when the time is at hand and the
harvest work of separating is due to begin. And our Lord, true to his promise, has not
left us in darkness, but is giving the information now due, to all whose hearts are ready
for it. "Ye, brethren, are not in darkness [nor sleep] that that day should overtake
you as a thief." `1 Thess. 5:4`
The truth now due is the sickle in this harvest, just as a similar
sickle was used in the Jewish harvest. The reapers, the angels*
or messengers, now, are the Lord's followers, just as a similar class were the reapers in
the Jewish harvest. And though others, throughout the age, were told not to attempt the
separation of the wheat from the tares, yet those now ready, worthy and obedient will be
shown the Lord's plan and arrangement so clearly that they will recognize his voice in
the time of harvest, saying, "Thrust in the sickle" of present truth, and
"gather my saints together unto me, those that have made a covenant with me by
sacrifice." "They shall be mine, saith the Lord of hosts, in that day
when I make up my jewels." `Psa. 50:5`; `Mal. 3:17`
Not only is this the time for the gathering of the saints by the truth (into
oneness with their Lord and each other, and out of fellowship with mere professors,
tares), but it is also a time for cleaning up the field by consuming the tares, stubble,
weeds, etc., preparatory to the new sowing. In one sense the "wheat" is gathered
out from among the tares-- because of the greater abundance of tares--as when the Lord
says, "Come out of her, my people." Yet, in another sense, the separation is
properly represented by the tares
----------
*The word "angel" signifies messenger.
::page 140::
being gathered from the wheat. Really, the wheat has the place by right; it is a
wheat-field, not a tare-field (the world of mankind being counted the ground out of which
the wheat and also the tares grow or develop); so it is the tares that are out of place
and need to be removed. The Lord started the wheat-field, and the wheat represents the
children of the Kingdom. (`Matt. 13:38`) And since the field or world is to be given to
these, and already belongs to them by promise, the parable shows that really it is the
tares that are gathered out and burned, leaving the field, and all in it, to the wheat.
The tares are returned to the ground (world) whence they came, and the first-fruits of the
wheat are to be gathered into the garner, so that the earth may bring forth another crop.
The wheat was not to be bundled: the grains were originally planted separate
and independent, to associate only as one kind, under similar conditions. But the parable
declares that one of the effects of the harvest will be to gather and bind the tares in
bundles before the "burning" or "time of trouble." And this work is in
progress all around us. Never was there a time like it for Labor Unions, Capitalistic
Trusts and protective associations of every sort.
The civilized world is the "field" of the parable. In it, during
the Reformation, the winds of doctrinal strife, from one quarter and another, threw wheat
and tares together into great batches (denominations), inclining some in one direction
(doctrinally), and some in another. This huddled wheat and tares closely together, and
took away much of the individuality of all. The doctrinal storms are long past, but the divisions
continue from force of habit, and only here and there has a head of wheat attempted to
lift itself to uprightness from the weight of the mass.
But with the harvest time comes the release of the wheat from the weight and
hindrance of the tares. The sickle of
::page 141::
truth prepares this class for the freedom wherewith Christ originally made all free,
though the same sickle has an opposite influence upon the tares. The spirit of the tares
is toward sectarian greatness and show, rather than toward individual obedience
and allegiance to God. Hence, present truths, the tendency of which they at once discover
to be to condemn all sectarianism, and to test each individual, they reject and strongly
oppose. And, though disposed to unite with each other, all the sects unite in opposing the
disintegrating tendencies of present truth, to such an extent as to draw the cords slowly,
cautiously, yet tightly upon all individual thought and study on religious
subjects, lest their organizations should fall to pieces and, all the wheat escaping,
leave nothing but tares.
Each of the tare class seems aware that, if examined individually, he would
have no claim to the Kingdom promised to the close followers of the Lamb. The tares would
prefer to have the various sects judged as so many corporations, and in comparison one
with another, hoping thus to glide into the Kingdom glory on the merits of the wheat with
whom they are associated. But this they cannot do: the test of worthiness for the Kingdom
honors will be an individual one--of individual fidelity to God and his truth--and not a
trial of sects, to see which of them is the true one. And each sect seems to realize, in
the greater light of today, which is scattering the mists of bigotry and superstition,
that other sects have as good (and as little) right as itself to claim to be the one and
only true church. Forced to admit this, they seek to bind all by the impression that it is
essential to salvation to be joined to some one of their sects--it matters little to which
one. Thus they combine the idea of individual responsibility with sectarian bondage.
As an illustration of a popular cord recently drawn tightly by sectarianism
upon its votaries, we cite the seemingly
::page 142::
harmless, and, to many, seemingly advantageous, International Sunday School Lessons. These
lend the impression of unsectarian cooperation in Bible study, among all Christians. They
thus appear to be taking a grand step away from, and in advance of, the old
methods of studying with sectarian catechisms. These uniform lessons have the appearance
of being an abandonment of sectarianism and a coming together of all Christians to study
the Bible in its own light--a thing which all recognize to be the only proper course, but
which all sectarians refuse to do actually; for, be it noticed, these International S. S.
Lessons only appear to be unsectarian: they only appear to grant liberty
in Bible study. Really, each denomination prepares its own comments on the scriptures
contained in the lessons. And the committee which selects these lessons, aiming for the
outward appearance of harmony and union, selects such passages of scripture as there is
little difference of opinion upon. The passages and doctrines upon which they disagree,
the very ones which need most to be discussed, in order that the truths and errors of each
sect may be manifested, that a real union might be arrived at upon the basis of "one
Lord, one faith and one baptism"--these are ignored in the lessons, but still firmly
held as before by each sect.
The effect of these and other similar "union" methods is to make
Protestantism more imposing in appearance, and to say to the people in fact, if not in
words: You must join one of these sects, or you are not a child of God at all.
Really, it is not a union as one church, but a combination of separate and distinct
organizations, each as anxious as ever to retain its own organization as a sect or bundle,
but each willing to combine with others to make a larger and more imposing appearance
before the world. It is like the piling of sheaves together in a shock. Each sheaf retains
its own bondage or organization, and becomes bound yet more
::page 143::
tightly by being wedged and fastened in with other bundles, in a large and imposing stack.
The International Lesson system, in connection with modern methods of
"running" Sunday Schools, greatly aids sectarianism, and hinders real growth in
the knowledge of the truth, in yet another way. So general a lesson is presented in
connection with the "exercises" of the school, that there is scarcely time to
consider the guarded, printed questions, with prepared answers; and no time is left for
the truth-hungry Bible student, or the occasional earnest teacher, to bring out other
questions of greater importance, containing food for thought and profitable discussion.
Formerly, Bible classes met to study such portions of the Bible as they chose, and were
hindered from obtaining truth by the bondage of their own prejudice and superstition only,
and the earnest, truth-hungry ones were always able to make some progress. But now, when
increasing light is illuminating every subject and dispelling the fogs of superstition and
prejudice, it is hindered from shining upon the Bible class student by the very
International Lessons which claim to aid him. His time for Bible study is skillfully
directed, so that he may get no new ideas, but be so continually occupied in the use of
the "milk of the word" (greatly diluted with the traditions of men), as to take
away all appetite for the "strong meat" of more advanced truth. (`Heb. 5:14`) In
such classes, all time and opportunity for tasting and learning to appreciate
"meat" is sacrificed, in obedience to the words, "We must stick to our
lesson; for the hour will soon expire." Well has the prophet, as well as the apostle,
declared that, to appreciate the great doctrines of God, so essential to our growth in
grace and in the knowledge and love of God, we must leave the first principles and go on
unto perfection--"weaned from the milk, and drawn from the breasts." `Heb. 6:1`;
`Isa. 28:9`
::page 144::
While Sunday School methods have recently been considerably improved, they
still leave much to be desired. They contain some of the best of the Lord's people--who,
anxious to serve the Master, are more or less bewildered by the show of numbers and
appearance of "work for the Lord." Some good is accomplished, we admit,
but it has its offsets. The earnest are hindered from personal duty and progress, in the
doing of that which God committed to the parents, the neglect of which is an injury to the
parents as well as to the children. The immature find the brief session and
"exercises" more agreeable than Bible study. They are let to feel that they have
performed a duty; and the sacrifice of the few moments is repaid by the
social gossip and interchange which it affords. The little ones, too, like the
"exercises," the singing, story-books, picnics, treats and general
entertainment, best; and they and their mothers feel well repaid for the labor of
dressing, by the opportunity thus afforded for showing their fine clothing. And the
parental responsibility of religious home-training is very largely resigned in favor of
the sham and machinery of the Sunday School. The Sunday School has been well named the
nursery of the church and the little ones thus brought up in the nurture and admonition of
the worldly spirit are the young shoots of that abundant crop of tares with which great
Babylon is completely overrun.
Wherever, here and there, an adult Bible class does exist, and the teacher is
candid and independent enough to leave the prescribed lesson, and follow up more important
topics, giving liberty for the truth to be brought forward, whether favorable or
unfavorable to the creed of the sect, he is marked by the worldly-wise pastor or
superintendent as an unsafe teacher. Such teachers are indeed dangerous to sectarianism,
and are very soon without classes. Such teachers, and the truths they would admit to
candid investigation,
::page 145::
would soon cut the cords and scatter the sectarian bundles, and hence are not long wanted.
Others are therefore preferred, who can hold the thoughts of their classes, divert them
from "strong meat," and keep them unweaned babes, too weak to stand alone, and
bound to the systems which they learn to love, and believe they would die without. The
true teacher's place, and the true Bible student's place, is outside of all human bondage,
free to examine and feed upon all portions of the good Word of God, and untrammeled to
follow the Lamb whithersoever he leads. `John 8:36`; `Gal. 5:1`
While individual liberty must outwardly be recognized as never
before, we see that really there never was a time when the bands were so thoroughly drawn,
to bind all wheat and tares into the many bundles. There never was a time when
arrangements were so close, and so restraining of all personal liberties, as now. Every
spare hour of a zealous sectarian is filled by some of the many meetings or projects, so
that no time for untrammeled thought and Bible study can be had. The principal design of
these meetings, entertainments, etc., is sectarian growth and strength; and the effect is
the bondage mentioned, so detrimental to the real development of the consecrated children
of God, the wheat. These bands are being made stronger, as the prophet intimates. (`Isa.
28:22`) Some wheat and many tares constitute these bundles, from which it daily becomes
more difficult to get free.
From what we have seen of the small quantity of truly consecrated wheat, and
the great mass of "baptized profession" (as a Methodist bishop has forcibly
described the tare class), it is evident that the burning of the tares will be a momentous
event. It is a mistake, however, which many make, to suppose that the burning of the tares
in a furnace of fire, where there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth
::page 146::
(`Matt. 13:42`), refers either to a literal fire, or to trouble beyond the present life.
The entire parable belongs to the present age. Not only is this fire a symbol, as well as
the wheat and the tares, but it symbolizes the destruction of the tares, in the
great time of trouble with which this age is to close, and from which the wheat class is
promised an escape. (`Mal. 3:17`; `Luke 21:36`) The great furnace of fire symbolizes the
"great time of trouble" coming, in the close of this harvest, upon the unworthy
tare class of "Christendom."
Nor does the destruction of the tares imply the destruction, either present
or future, of all the individuals composing the tare class. It signifies rather a
destruction of the false pretentions of this class. Their claim or profession is that they
are Christians, whereas they are still children of this world. When burned or destroyed as
tares, they will be recognized in their true character--as members of the world, and will
no longer imitate Christians, as nominal members of Christ's Church.
Our Lord explains that he sowed the good seed of the Kingdom, the truth, from
which springs all the true wheat class, begotten by the spirit of truth.
Afterward, during the night, the dark ages, Satan sowed tares. Doubtless the tares were
sown in the same manner as the wheat. They are the offspring of errors. We have seen how
grievously the sanctuary and the host were defiled by the great adversary and his blinded
servants, and how the precious vessels (doctrines) were profaned and misapplied by Papacy;
and this is but another showing of the same thing. False doctrines begat false aims and
ambitions in the Lord's wheat-field, and led many to Satan's service, to sow errors of
doctrine and practice which have brought forth tares abundantly.
The field looks beautiful and flourishing to many, as they count by the
hundreds of millions. But really the proportion of wheat is very small, and it had been
far better for the
::page 147::
wheat, which has been choked and greatly hindered from development by the tares, if the
worldly-spirited tares had not been in the Church, but in their own place in the world,
leaving the consecrated "little flock," the only representatives of Christ's
spirit and doctrine, in the field. Then the difference between the Church and the world
would be very marked, and her growth, though apparently less rapid, would have
been healthy. The great seeming success manifested by numbers and wealth and social
standing, in which many glory so much, is really a great injury, and in no sense a
blessing, either to the Church or to the world.
As we examine this subject, we find that many of these tares are little to
blame for their false position as imitation wheat. Nor do many of them know that the tares
are not the real Church; for they regard the little flock of consecrated wheat as
extremists and fanatics. And, when compared with the tare multitude, the Lord and the
apostles and all the wheat certainly do appear to be extremists and fanatics, if the
majority, the tares, be in the right.
The tares have been so thoroughly and so often assured that they are
Christians--that all are Christians except Jews, infidels and heathens--that they could
scarcely be expected to know to the contrary. False doctrines assure them that there are
but two classes, and that all who escape everlasting torment are to be joint-heirs with
Christ. Every funeral discourse, except in the case of the miserably degraded and the
openly wicked and immoral, assures the friends of the peace and joy and heavenly glory of
the deceased; and, to prove it, passages of scripture are quoted, which, from the context,
should be seen to apply only to the fully consecrated, the saints.
Naturally inclined to reprove themselves, to conscientiously deny that they
are saints, and to disclaim the rich promises of the Scriptures to such, they are
persuaded
::page 148::
to claim them, by their no better informed fellow-tares, both in pulpits and pews. They
conscientiously feel--indeed they are certain--that they have done nothing which would
justly merit everlasting torture; and their faith in the false doctrines of
"Christendom" leads them to hope, and to claim, that they and all moral people
are members of the Church to which all the rich promises belong. Thus they are tares by
force of false doctrines, and not only occupy a false position themselves, but
misrepresent the truly high standard of saintship. Under the delusion of the error, they
feel a sense of security and satisfaction; for, measuring themselves and their lives with
those of the majority in the nominal church, and with their deceased friends to whose
funeral eulogies they have listened, they find themselves at least average--and even more
consistent than many of loud profession. Yet they are conscious that they have never made
any real consecration of heart and life, time and means, talents and opportunities, to God
and his service.
But as the "chaff" class of the Jewish nation was consumed
in the close of that harvest (`Luke 3:17`), so this "tare" class will
be consumed in this harvest. As the chaff ceased from all pretention to divine favor as
the triumphing Kingdom of God, before that harvest closed in the great fire of
religious and political contention, which consumed that system, so it shall be with the
tare class of so-called "Christendom." They will be consumed; they will cease
to be tares; they will cease to deceive either themselves or others; they will cease
to apply to themselves the exceeding great and precious promises which belong only to the
overcoming saints; and, when their various so-called Christian kingdoms, and their various
religious organizations, rent by discords induced by the increasing light of truth, will
be consumed in the fire already kindled, "the fire of God's zeal" (the
great time of trouble with which this age will end--
::page 149::
`Zeph. 3:8`), they will cease to claim for their worldly systems the name
"Christendom."
After telling of the burning of the tares, the parable further declares,
"Then shall the righteous [the wheat] shine forth as the sun in the Kingdom
of their Father." [What better testimony than this could we have, that the true
Church is not yet set up in power, as God's Kingdom, and that it will not be thus exalted
until this harvest is ended?] Then shall this sun of righteousness (of which Christ Jesus
will always be the central glory) arise with healing in his beams, to bless, restore,
purify and disinfect from sin and error the whole world of mankind; the incorrigible being
destroyed in the second death.
Let the fact be remembered that, in the typical Jewish harvest, Israelites
indeed, as well as imitation Israelites, constituted the Jewish or Fleshly House of
Israel; that only the true Israelites were selected and gathered into the gospel
garner, and honored with the truths belonging to the Gospel age; and that all others of
that nation ("chaff") were not physically destroyed (though of course many lives
were lost in their trouble), but were cut off from all Kingdom favors in which previously
they trusted and boasted. Then trace the parallel and counterpart of this, in the
treatment of the "tares" in the present burning time.
Not only has the Lord shown us what to expect in this "harvest,"
and our share in it, both in being separated ourselves and, as "reapers," in
using the sickle of truth to assist others to liberty in Christ and separation from false
human systems and bondages, but in order to render us doubly sure that we are right, and
that the separating time of the harvest has arrived, he provided us proofs of the very
year the harvest work began, its length, and when it will close. These, already examined,
show that the close of 1874 marked the beginning, as the close of 1914 will mark the
::page 150::
end, of this 40 years of harvest; while all the minutiae of the order and work of this
harvest were portrayed in that of the Jewish age, its type. Some of the marked
time-features of that typical harvest we will now examine, and note the lessons which they
teach, which are applicable now, and which our Lord evidently designed for this purpose,
so that we might not be in either doubt or uncertainty, but might know of his plan, and be
able to act accordingly, with strength, as cooperators with him in carrying out his
revealed will.
All the time-features connected with the Jewish harvest (though they
sometimes indirectly related to the faithful), had their direct bearing upon the great
nominal mass, and marked periods of its trial, rejection, overthrow and destruction as a
system or church-nation. Thus the Lord, as the Bridegroom and reaper, came (A.D. 29) not
to the true Israelites only, but to the entire mass. (`John 1:11`) The progress
of the harvest work there disclosed the fact that the grains of ripe wheat fit for the
garner (the Gospel dispensation) were few, and that the great mass was wheat merely in
appearance--in reality only "chaff," devoid of the real wheat principle within.
When, three and a half years later (A.D. 33), our Lord assumed the office of King, and
permitted (what before he had refused--`John 6:15`) that the people should mount him upon
an ass and hail him King, it marked a point in this antitypical, Gospel harvest more
important far than that of the type. The parallel to this, as we have seen, points to 1874
as the time of our Lord's second presence as Bridegroom and Reaper, and to April 1878 as
the time when he began to exercise his office of King of kings and Lord of lords in very
deed--this time a spiritual King, present with all power, though invisible to men.
The doings of our Lord, while there for a few hours typically
::page 151::
acting as King of Israel, are deeply significant to us, as unquestionably indicating, and
shadowing forth, what must be expected here. What men saw him do at that time,
such as riding on an ass into Jerusalem as king, and scourging the money-changers out of
the temple, we recognize as typical--as done here on a larger scale, though the
King, and the scourge of cords, and the proclamation of kingly authority, are now
manifested in a very different way, and to the eye of faith only. But the Jewish type
serves to call attention to this fulfilment, which otherwise we would not be able to
appreciate. The first work of the typical King was to reject the entire church-nation of
Israel as unworthy to be his Kingdom, or longer to be treated as his special heritage.
This was expressed thus: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and
stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children
together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not. Behold,
your house is left unto you desolate!" `Matt. 23:37-39`
This, when applied to the present harvest, teaches that as in A.D. 33 typical
Israel, after being recognized as God's people for 1845 years by favors, chastisements,
etc., was cast off, rejected by the King, because found unworthy, after a trial and
inspection of three and a half years, so in the present harvest, after a similar three and
a half years of inspection, and at the close of a similar period of 1845 years of favor
and chastisement, nominal Christendom would be rejected by the King as unworthy longer to
receive any favors from him, or to be recognized in any manner by him.
But, as the rejection of nominal Fleshly Israel did not imply the rejection,
individually, of any "Israelite indeed," in whom was no guile, but rather a
still greater favor to such (who were set free from the "blind guides," and
taught more directly and perfectly through new spiritual channels --the apostles), so here
we must expect the same. The
::page 152::
spiritual favors, formerly bestowed upon the nominal mass, belong henceforth only to the
faithful and obedient. Henceforth the light, as it becomes due, and "the meat in due
season for the household of faith," must be expected, not through former channels, in
any degree, but through faithful individuals outside of the fallen, rejected systems.
During his ministry, and up to the time when, as King, he cast off the Jewish
system, our Lord recognized the scribes and Pharisees as the legitimate instructors of the
people, even though he often upbraided them as hypocrites who deceived the people. This is
evident from the Lord's words (`Matt. 23:2`)--"The scribes and the Pharisees sit in
Moses' seat; whatsoever therefore they bid you do, that observe and do." So,
likewise, for a time the great religious rulers of nominal Christendom in Synods,
Conferences, Councils, etc., measurably sat in Christ's seat as instructors of the people,
as the Jewish Sanhedrin once occupied Moses' seat. But as, after A.D. 33, the scribes and
Pharisees were no longer recognized by the Lord in any sense, and the true Israelites were
no longer instructed by these, but by God himself, through other, humbler, untitled and
more worthy instruments, who were raised up among the people and specially taught of God,
so we must expect and do find it here, in this parallel harvest.
The taking of the kingly office by our Lord in A.D. 33, and his first
official act in rejecting the national church of fleshly Israel, taken in connection with
all the striking parallels of the two ages, indicate very clearly that at the parallel
point of time in the present harvest, i.e., 1878, mystic Babylon, otherwise called
Christendom, the antitype of Judaism, was cut off; and there went forth the message,
"Babylon the great is fallen, is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and
the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird." `Rev.
18:2`
::page 153::
The fall, plagues, destruction, etc., foretold to come upon mystic Babylon,
were foreshadowed in the great trouble and national destruction which came upon fleshly
Israel, and which ended with the complete overthrow of that nation in A.D. 70. And the
period of falling also corresponds; for from the time our Lord said, "Your house is
left unto you desolate," A.D. 33, to A.D. 70 was 36 1/2 years; and so from A.D. 1878
to the end of A.D. 1914 is 36 1/2 years. And, with the end of A.D. 1914, what God calls
Babylon, and what men call Christendom, will have passed away, as already shown from
prophecy.
Judaism was a divinely appointed type of the Millennial Kingdom of Christ
which will control and regulate all matters; hence Judaism was properly a union of church
and state--of religious and civil government. But, as we have already shown, the Gospel
Church was in no sense to be associated in, or to have anything to do with, the government
of the world, until her Lord, the King of kings, comes, assumes control, and exalts her as
his bride to share in that reign of righteousness. Neglecting the Lord's words, and
following human wisdom, theories and plans, the great system called Christendom, embracing
all governments and creeds professing to be Christ's (but a miserable counterfeit
of the true Kingdom of Christ), was organized before the time, without the Lord, and of
wholly unfit elements. The fall of Babylon as an unfit church-state system, and the
gathering out of the worthy wheat, therefore, can be and is well illustrated by the fall
of Judaism.
The name Babylon originally signified God's gateway; but afterward,
in derision, it came to mean mixture or confusion.
::page 154::
In the book of Revelation this name is applied specifically to the church nominal, which,
from being the gate-way to glory, became a gate-way to error and confusion, a miserable
mixture composed chiefly of tares, hypocrites--a confused mass of worldly profession in
which the Lord's jewels are buried, and their true beauty and luster hidden. In symbolic
prophecy, the term Babylon is applied at times only to the Church of Rome, called
"Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots." The name could apply only to her for
centuries, so long as she was the only mixed system and would tolerate no others; but
other ecclesiastical systems, not so great as the "mother," nor yet so wicked,
nor so radically wrong, sprang up out of her, through various attempted though imperfect
reforms. Errors, tares and worldliness in these also largely predominating, the name
Babylon is used as a general or family name for all the nominal Christian systems, and now
includes not only the Church of Rome, but all Protestant sects as well; for, since Papacy
is designated the mother system, we must regard the various Protestant systems which
descended from her as the daughters--a fact very generally admitted by Protestants, and
sometimes with pride.
Previous to the harvest time, many of God's people in Great Babylon
discovered her real predominant character to be grossly antichristian (notably the
Waldenses, the Huguenots and the reformers of the sixteenth century); and, calling
attention to the fact, they separated from the mother system and led others with them,
many of whom were tares, as the prophet had predicted, saying, "Many shall cleave to
them with flatteries." (`Dan. 11:34`) Here were the separatings of the
politico-doctrinal storms before the harvest time. Among these the tares, still
predominating, formed other, though less objectionable, Babylonish systems.
Thus the wheat, though from time to time endeavoring
::page 155::
to free themselves from the incubus of the tares (and especially from the grosser errors
which fostered and produced the tares), and though blessed by these efforts, were still
under their influence, still mixed with large predominance of the tare element. But for
the wheat's sake God's favor extended even to these mixed bunches or Babylonish systems;
and not until God's time for effecting a complete and final separation--in the time of
harvest, 1878--were those systems completely and forever cast off from all favor, and
sentenced to swift destruction, and all of God's people explicitly and imperatively called
out of them. In the very beginning of the age, God's people were warned against the
deceptions of Antichrist, and taught to keep separate from it; and yet, for their trial
and testing, they were permitted to be in a measure deceived by it and more or less mixed
up with it. Every awakening to a realization of unchristian principles, doctrines and
doings, which led to reform measures, tested and proved the wheat class, and helped to
purify them more and more from the pollutions of Antichrist. But this last testing and
positive call, coupled with the utter rejection of those systems, no longer to receive
divine favor (as they had formerly received it, for the sake of the wheat in them), is to
effect the final separation of the wheat class from all antichristian systems and
principles. What truths those systems formerly held are now fast being swept away from
them, being displaced by theories of men, subversive of every element of divine truth; and
vital godliness and piety are being rapidly displaced by the love of pleasure and the
spirit of the world.
With the declaration that Babylon is fallen comes also the command to all of
God's people still in her, to come out--"And I heard another voice from heaven,
saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and
that ye receive not of her plagues." (`Rev. 18:4`) The expression, "Babylon is
fallen: Come out of her, my
::page 156::
people," clearly marks two thoughts which should be distinctly remembered. It
indicates that at one time Babylon was not fallen from divine favor; that for a time she
retained a measure of favor, notwithstanding her mixed character; that, however large the
proportion of error which she held, and however little of the spirit of Christ which she
manifested, she was not entirely cast off from God's favor until the harvest time of
separation. It indicates that at some time a sudden and utter rejection is to come upon
Babylon, when all favor will forever cease, and when judgments will follow--just such a
rejection as we have shown was due in 1878. It indicates, also, that at the time of
Babylon's rejection many of God's people would be in and associated with Babylon; for it
is after Babylon's rejection, or fall from favor, that these are called to--"Come out
of her, my people."
The contrast between the many gradual reform movements of the past four
hundred years and this final complete separation should be clearly discerned: they were
permitted attempts to reform Babylon, while this recognizes her as beyond all
hope of reform--"Babylon hath been a golden cup in the Lord's hand, that made all the
earth drunken; the nations have drunken of her wine; therefore the nations are mad
[intoxicated with her errors]. Babylon is suddenly fallen and broken: wail for her; take
balm for her wound, if so be she may be healed. We would have healed Babylon,
but she is not healed: forsake her, and let us go every one unto his own country [to the
true Church, or to the world, as the case may be, according as each is thus proved to be
of the wheat or the tares]: for her punishment reacheth unto heaven." `Jer. 51:7-9`.
Compare `Rev. 17:4; 14:8;` `18:2,3,5,19`.
Unhealed Babylon is now sentenced to destruction: the whole system--a system
of systems--is rejected, and all of God's people not in sympathy with her false doctrines
and
::page 157::
practices are now called to separate themselves from her. The prophet gives the reason for
this sentence of rejection, and the failure of some to comprehend it, saying:
"The stork in the heavens knoweth her appointed times; and the turtle
and the crane and the swallow observe the time of their coming home; but my people know
not the arrangement of the Lord. [They do not recognize that a harvest time of full and
complete separation of wheat, from chaff and tares, must come. In this they show less
discernment than the migratory fowls.] How can ye say, We are wise, and the Law of the
Lord is with us [when you cannot discern the harvest time and the change of dispensations
then due]? Truly, behold in vain wrought the pen, in vain the writers [because the word of
the Lord by his prophets and apostles is made void, and set aside without attention, and
creeds formed in the past "dark ages" are the lightless lanterns of them that
walk in darkness]. The wise (?) [learned] men are ashamed; they are disheartened [by the
failure of their cherished human schemes] and caught: lo, the word of the Lord have they
rejected, and what wisdom have they [now]? [Compare `Isaiah 29:10`.] Therefore will I give
their wives [churches] unto others, and their fields [of labor] to the conquerors; for,
from the least even to the greatest, every one [of them] is seeking his own personal
advantage--from the prophet [orator] even unto the priest [minister], every one practiceth
falsehood. [Compare `Isa. 56:10-12; 28:14-20`.] And they heal the sore of the daughter of
my people [nominal Zion--Babylon] very lightly, saying, Peace, peace: when there is no
peace [when her whole system is diseased, and needs thorough cleansing with the medicine
of God's Word--the truth]. They should have been ashamed of their abominable work; but
they neither felt the least shame, nor did they know how to blush: therefore shall they
[the teachers] fall among them that fall; in the time of their visitation [or
inspection--in the "harvest"]
::page 158::
they shall stumble, saith the Lord. I will surely make an end of them, saith the Lord;
there shall be left no grapes on the vine, and no figs on the fig tree, and the leaf shall
wither; and the things that I have given them [all divine favors and privileges] shall
pass away from them." `Jer. 8:7-13`
The succeeding verse shows that many of the rejected will realize the
troubles coming, yet will still be blind to their real cause. They will say, Let us unite
ourselves and entrench ourselves in the strong cities [governments], and keep silence.
They somehow realize that neither reason nor Scripture supports their false doctrines, and
that the wisest method is to keep silent, in the shadow of old superstitions and under the
protection of so-called Christian governments. They are here represented as saying very
truly: "The Lord hath put us to silence, and given us bitter poison-water to
drink." The only refreshment they may have is the cup which they have mixed (the
poison of bitter error, the "doctrine of devils," mingled with the pure water of
life, the truth of God's Word). Shall not such as are of and who love Babylon, and who are
therefore unready to obey the command, "Come out of her," be forced to drink the
cup of their own mixing? Shall not such be forced to admit the falsity of their doctrines?
They surely shall; and they will all be thoroughly nauseated by it. The next verse tells
of the disappointment of their expectations, which were that their bitter (poison-water)
doctrines would have converted the world and brought about the Millennium. They say,
"We looked for peace, but no good came; and for a time of health, and behold
trouble!"--The disease of nominal Zion will grow rapidly worse from the time of her
visitation and rejection, when the "Israelites indeed," obeying the divine call,
begin to come out of the nominal systems.
Some wonder why the Lord does not institute a still greater reform than any
of the past, which have proved so futile and short-lived. They ask, Why does he not pour
::page 159::
out a blessing upon all the great sects and amalgamate them all into one, or else upon
some one and purify it of dross, and draw all others into it? But, we ask, Why not also
amalgamate all the kingdoms of earth into one, and purify it?
It should be sufficient for all of God's children to know that such is not
what he reveals as his plan. And a little further reflection, from the standpoint of God's
Word, shows us the unreasonableness of such a suggestion. Consider the number of the
professed church (four hundred millions) and ask yourself, How many of these would
themselves claim to be fully consecrated, mind and body, to the Lord and the
service of his plan? Your own observation must lead you to the conclusion that to
separate the "wheat" from the "tares," by removing the
"tares," would in almost every instance leave but a small handful even in the
largest church buildings or cathedrals.
The reason for not attempting to purify the nominal systems is that no amount
of cleansing would make the unconsecrated mass of "Christendom" and their
organizations, civil and ecclesiastical, suitable to the Lord's work, now to be commenced
in the earth. During the past eighteen centuries he has been selecting the truly
consecrated, the worthy ones, and now all that remains to be done is to select from among
the living those of the same class--and they are but few--as only a few are lacking to
complete the foreordained number of members in the body of Christ.
The reason for discarding all human organizations, and not reforming the
least objectionable one and calling out of all others into it, now, is shown by our Lord's
treatment of the various Jewish sects in the harvest or close of their dispensation; for
then, as now, all were rejected, and the "Israelites indeed" were called out of
all, into freedom, and taught the will and plan of God by various chosen vessels of God's
own selection.
::page 160::
Illustrating this subject to the Jews, the Lord in two parables explained the
wisdom of his course: first, that a patch of new cloth upon a very old garment would only
make the weakness of the garment more noticeable, and from the inequality of strength the
rent would be made greater; second, that new wine put into old wine-skins, out of which
all the stretch and elasticity had gone, would be sure to damage, rather than benefit, for
the result would be not only to speedily burst and destroy the old wine-skins, but also to
lose the valuable new wine.
Our Lord's new doctrines were the new wine, while the Jewish sects were the
old wine-skins. Suppose that our Lord had joined one of those sects and had begun a reform
in it: what would have been the result? There can be no doubt that the new truths, if
received, would have broken up that sect completely. The power of its organization, built
largely upon sectarian pride, and cemented by errors, superstitions and human traditions,
would forthwith have been destroyed, and the new doctrines would have been left stranded
--hampered, too, by all the old errors and traditions of that sect, and held responsible
for its past record by the world in general.
For the same reasons, the Lord here, in the present harvest, in introducing
the fuller light of truth, at the dawn of the Millennial age, does not put it as a patch
upon any of the old systems, nor as new wine into old skins. First, because none of them
are in a fit condition to be patched, or to receive the new doctrines. Second, because the
new truths, if received, would soon begin to work, and would develop a power which would
burst any sect, no matter how thoroughly organized and bound. If tried, one after another,
the result would be the same, and, in the end, the new wine (doctrines) would have none to
contain and preserve it.
::page 161::
The proper and best course was the one followed by our Lord at the first
advent. He made an entirely new garment out of the new stuff, and put the new wine into
new wine-skins; i.e., he called out the Israelites indeed (non-sectarian), and committed
to them the truths then due. And so now: he is calling out the truth-hungry from nominal
spiritual Israel; and it becomes them to accept the truth in the Lord's own way, and to
cooperate with him heartily in his plan, no matter which, or how many, of the old
wine-skins are passed by and rejected as unfit to contain it. Rejoice, rather, that you
are counted worthy to have this new wine of present truth testified to you, and, as fast
as proved, receive it and act upon it gladly.
Those who at the first advent waited to learn the opinion and follow the lead
of prominent sectarians, and who inquired, "Have any of the scribes or Pharisees
believed on him?" did not receive the truth, because they were followers of men
rather than of God; for prominent sectarians then did not accept of Christ's teaching, and
the same class always have been, and still are, the blindest leaders of the blind. Instead
of accepting the truth and being blessed, they "fall" in the time of trial. The
old garment and the old wine-skins are so out of condition as to be totally unfit for
further use.
Since it is the Lord who calls his people out of Babylon, we cannot doubt
that, whatever may be his agencies for giving the call, all truly his people will hear it;
and not only will their obedience be tested by the call, but also their love of Babylon
and affinity for her errors will be tested. If they approve her doctrines, methods, etc.,
so as to be loathe to leave her, they will prove themselves unworthy of present truth, and
deserving of her coming plagues. But the words of the call indicate that God's true people
in Babylon are
::page 162::
not to be considered as implicated in her sins of worldliness and ignoring of divine
truth, up to the time they shall learn that Babylon is fallen--cast off. Then, if
they continue in her, they are esteemed as being of her, in the
sense of approving her wrong deeds and doctrines, past and present, and shall be counted
as partakers of her sins, and therefore meriting a share of their punishment, the
plagues coming upon her. See `Rev. 18:4`.
How strong the expression, "She is become the habitation of demons, and
the hold of every foul spirit, and a cage of every unclean and hateful bird." How
true it is, that the most execrable of society seek and wear the garb of Christian
profession and ceremonialism, in some of the various quarters (sects) of Babylon. Every
impure principle and doctrine, somehow and somewhere, finds representation in her. And she
is a "cage" which holds securely not only the Lord's meek and gentle doves, but
also many unclean and hateful birds. Of all the defaulters, and deceivers of men and of
women, how many are professedly members of Christ's Church! and how many even use their
profession as a cloak under which to forward evil schemes! It is well known that a
majority of even the most brutal criminals executed die in the Roman Catholic communion.
Babylon has contained both the best and the worst, both the cream and the
dregs, of the population of the civilized world. The cream is the small class of truly
consecrated ones, sadly mixed up with the great mass of mere professors and the filthy,
criminal dregs; but under favorable conditions the cream class will be separated in the
present harvest, preparatory to being glorified.
As an illustration of the proportion of the unclean and hateful birds, in and
out of Babylon, note the following official report of the condition of society in a
quarter of the wheatfield where "Orthodoxy" has for centuries boasted of
::page 163::
the fine quality and purity of its wheat and the fewness of its tares, and where "The
Church," so-called, has been associated with the government in making the laws and in
ruling the people:
The Status of Society in England and Wales
Parliamentary Report Made in 1873
Population by Religious Professions |
|
| Roman Catholics | 1,500,000 |
| Church of England | 6,933,935 |
| Dissenters [Protestants other than Episcopalians] | 7,234,158 |
| Infidels | 7,000,000 |
| Jews | 57,000 |
Total Number of Criminals in Jails |
|
| Roman Catholics | 37,300 |
| Church of England | 96,600 |
| Dissenters | 10,800 |
| Infidels | 350 |
| Jews | 0 |
| 145,050 | |
Criminals to Every 100,000 Population |
|
| Roman Catholics | 2,500 |
| Church of England | 1,400 |
| Dissenters | 150 |
| Infidels | 5 |
| Jews | 0 |
Proportion of Criminals |
|
| Roman Catholics | 1 in 40 |
| Church of England | 1 in 72 |
| Dissenters | 1 in 666 |
| Infidels | 1 in 20,000 |
::page 164::
The cause of this mixed condition is stated: "Babylon made all the
peoples drunk with the wine [spirit, influence] of her fornication"--worldly
affiliation. (`Rev. 18:3`) False teachings concerning the character and mission of the
Church, and the claim that the time for her exaltation and reign had come (and
particularly after the great boom of success which her worldly ambition received in the
time of Constantine, when she claimed to be the Kingdom of God set up to reign in
power and great glory), led many into Babylon, who would never have united with her had
she continued in the narrow way of sacrifice. Pride and ambition led to the grasping of
worldly power by the early Church. To obtain the power, numbers and worldly influence were
necessary. And to obtain the numbers, which, under present conditions, the truth never
would have drawn, false doctrines were broached, and finally obtained the ascendancy over
all others; and even truths which were still retained were disfigured and distorted. The
numbers came, even to hundreds of millions, and the true Church, the wheat, still but a
"little flock," was hidden among the millions of tares. Here, as sheep in the
midst of devouring wolves, the true embryo Kingdom of God suffered violence, and the
violent took it by force; and, like their Lord, in whose footprints they followed, they
were despised and rejected of men, men of sorrows and acquainted with grief.
But now, as the Millennial morning dawns, and the doctrinal errors of the
dark night past are discovered, and the real gems of truth are lighted up, the effect must
be, as designed, to separate completely the wheat from the tares. And, as false doctrines
produced the improper development, so the unfolding of truth in the light of harvest will
produce the separation. All of the tares and some of the wheat are fearful, however. To
them it seems that the dissolution of Babylon would be the overthrow of God's work,
::page 165::
and the failure of his cause. But not so: the tares never were wheat, and God never
proposed to recognize them as such. He merely permitted, "let," them both grow
together until the harvest. It is from Babylon's "cage" of unclean birds that
God's people are called out, that they may both enjoy the liberty and share the harvest
light and work, and prove themselves out of harmony with her errors of doctrine and
practice, and thus escape them and their reward--the plagues coming upon all remaining in
her.
These plagues or troubles, foreshadowed in the troubles upon the rejected
Jewish house, are pictured in such lurid symbols in the book of Revelation that many
students have very exaggerated and wild ideas on this subject, and are therefore
unprepared for the realities now closely impending. They often interpret the symbols
literally, and hence are unprepared to see them fulfilled as they will be--by religious,
social and political disturbances, controversies, upheavals, reactions, revolutions, etc.
But note another item here. Between the time when Babylon is cast off, falls
from favor (1878), and the time when the plagues or troubles come upon her, is a brief
interval, during which the faithful of the Lord's people are all to be informed on this
subject, and gathered out of Babylon. This is clearly shown in the same verse; for with
the message, "Babylon is fallen," is coupled the call, "Come out of her, my
people, that ye...receive not of her [coming] plagues." This same
interval of time, and the same work to be accomplished in it, are also referred to in
symbol, in `Rev. 7:3`. To the messenger of wrath the command is given, "Hurt not the
earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, until we have SEALED the servants
of our God in their foreheads." The forehead sealing indicates that a mental
comprehension of the truth will be the mark or seal which will separate and distinguish
the servants of God from the servants and votaries
::page 166::
of Babylon. And this agrees with Daniel's testimony: "The wise [of thy people] shall
understand; but none of the wicked [unfaithful to their covenant] shall understand."
(`Dan. 12:10`) Thus the classes are to be marked and separated before the plagues come
upon rejected, cast off Babylon.
And that this knowledge is to be both a sealing and a separating
agent is clearly implied in the verse before considered; for the declaration is first
made, that "Babylon is fallen," and that certain plagues or punishments are
coming upon her, before the Lord's people are expected to obey the command, "Come
out," based upon that knowledge. Indeed, we know that all must be well
"sealed in their foreheads" --intelligently informed--concerning God's plan,
before they can rightly appreciate or obey this command.
And is it not apparent that this very work of sealing the servants of God is
now progressing? Are we not being sealed in our foreheads? and that, too, at the very
proper time? Are we not being led, step by step, as by the Lord's own hand--by his
Word--to an appreciation of truth and affairs in general from his standpoint--reversing
our former opinions derived from other sources, on many subjects? Is it not true that the
various divisions or sects of Babylon have not been the channels through which this
sealing has come to us, but rather that they have been hindrances which prevented its
speedier accomplishment? And do we not see the propriety of it, as well as of the Lord's
declaration, that a separation of wheat and tares must occur in the harvest? And do we not
see it to be his plan, to reveal the facts to his faithful, and then to expect them to
show their hearty sympathy with that plan by prompt obedience? What if to obey and come
out obliges us to leave behind the praise of men, or a comfortable salary, or a parsonage
home, or financial aids in business, or domestic peace, or what not?--
::page 167::
yet let us not fear. He who says to us "Come!" is the same who said
"Come!" to Peter when he walked on the sea. Peter, in obeying, would have sunk,
had not the Lord's outstretched arm upheld him; and the same arm supports them well who
now, at his command, come out of Babylon. Look not at the boisterous sea of difficulties
between, but, looking directly to the Lord, be of good courage.
The command is Come, not Go; because in coming out of bondage to human
traditions, and creeds, and systems, and errors, we are coming directly to our Lord,
to be taught and fed by him, to be strengthened and perfected to do all his pleasure, and
to stand, and not to fall with Babylon.
God's Word reveals the fact that the nominal church, after its fall from his
favor and from being his mouthpiece (`Rev. 3:16`), will gradually settle into a condition
of unbelief, in which the Bible will eventually be entirely ignored in fact, though
retained in name, and in which philosophic speculations of various shades will be the real
creeds. From this fall the faithful sealed ones will escape; for they will be
"accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to
stand"--not fall, in the time of the Lord's presence. (`Luke 21:36`) In fact, many
are already thus settling --retaining the forms of worship, and faith in a Creator and in
a future life, but viewing these chiefly through their own or other men's philosophies and
theories, and ignoring the Bible as an infallible teacher of the divine purposes. These,
while retaining the Bible, disbelieve its narratives, especially that of Eden and the
fall. Retaining the name of Jesus, and calling him the Christ and the Savior, they regard
him merely as an excellent though not infallible exemplar, and reject entirely his
ransom-sacrifice--his cross. Claiming the Fatherhood of God to extend to sinners, they
repudiate both the curse and the Mediator.
It has not been generally observed that at the first advent
::page 168::
our Lord's ministry of three and a half years, up to the casting off of the Jewish nation
(their church and nation being one), was a trial or testing of that polity or system as
a whole, rather than of its individual members. Its clerical class--
Priests, Scribes and Pharisees--represented that system as a whole. They themselves
claimed thus to represent Judaism (`John 7:48,49`), and the people so regarded them; hence
the force of the inquiry, Have any of the rulers or Pharisees believed on him? And our
Lord so recognized them: he rarely rebuked the people for failure to receive him,
but repeatedly held responsible the "blind leaders," who would neither enter
into the Kingdom themselves, nor permit the people, who otherwise would have received
Jesus as Messiah and King, to do so.
Our Lord's constant effort was to avoid publicity--to prevent his miracles
and teachings from inciting the people, lest they should take him by force, and
make him king (`John 6:15`); and yet he constantly brought these testimonies or evidences
of his authority and Messiahship to the notice of the Jewish clergy, up to the time when,
their trial as a church-nation being ended, their house or system was cast off, "left
desolate." Then, by his direction and under the apostles' teachings, all efforts were
directed to the people individually; and the cast off church-organization and its
officers, as such, were wholly ignored.
In evidence that during his ministry, and until their system was rejected,
the teachers and priests represented it, note the Lord's course with the cleansed leper,
as recorded in `Matt. 8:4`. Jesus said to him, "See thou tell no man; but go
thy way, show thyself to the priest and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for
a testimony unto THEM." The evidence or testimony was to be hidden from the
people for a time, but to be promptly given to their "rulers," who
represented the Jewish church in the trial then in progress.
::page 169::
We should notice particularly the object and results of the trial of the
Jewish church as a system, because of their typical bearing upon the present trial of the
Gospel Church, as well as their relationship toward the entire plan of God. They
professed, in harmony with God's promises, to be the people ready for the coming
Messiah, the people whom he would organize, empower, direct and use as his "own
people," in blessing all the other nations of the earth, by bringing all to a
full knowledge of God and to opportunities of harmony with his righteous laws. God, though
by his foreknowledge aware that Fleshly Israel would be unfit for the chief place in this
great work, nevertheless gave them every opportunity and advantage the same as though he
were ignorant of the results. Meanwhile he disclosed his foreknowledge in prophetic
statements which they could not comprehend, lest we should suppose that he had
experimented, and failed, in his dealings with the Jewish people.
So long as Israel as a church-nation claimed to be ready, waiting and anxious
to carry out their part of the program, it was but just that they should be tested,
before God's further plan should go into effect. That further plan was, that when the
natural seed of Abraham should, by their testing, be proved unfit for the chief honor
promised and sought, then an election or selection should be made, during the Gospel age,
of individuals worthy of the high honor of being the promised seed of Abraham, and
joint-heirs with Messiah in the promised Kingdom, which would lift up and bless all the
families of the earth. `Gal. 3:16,27-29,14`
The "seventy-weeks" (490 years) of divine favor promised to the
Jewish people could not fail of fulfilment; and hence in no sense could Gentiles, or even
Samaritans, be invited to become disciples, or in any sense to be associated with the
Kingdom which Christ and the apostles preached. (`Acts 3:26`) "It was necessary
that the word of God [the invitation
::page 170::
to share the Kingdom] should first have been preached to you," said
Paul, addressing Jews. (`Acts 13:46`) "Go not into the way of the Gentiles, and into
any city of the Samaritans enter ye not; but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of
Israel"; and again: "I am not sent, except to the lost sheep of the house of
Israel," said the Master, sending forth his disciples. `Matt. 10:5; 15:24`
The entire "seventieth week," in the midst of which Christ
died--the seven years from the beginning of our Lord's ministry to the sending of Peter to
preach to Cornelius, the first Gentile convert--was set apart by God's arrangement for the
Jewish trial. But instead of testing them as a whole (as a church-nation) all of those
seven years, that testing was "cut short in righteousness"--that is, not to
their disadvantage, but to their advantage. Because it was evident, not only to God but to
men also, that the Pharisees, priests and scribes not only rejected, but toward the last
hated, the Lord Jesus and sought to kill him; therefore, when the time had come for him to
offer himself publicly as King, riding to them on the ass, when not received by
the representatives of the church-nation, the King promptly disowned that system, though
the common people received him gladly and insisted on his recognition as king. (`Mark
12:37`) Thus our Lord cut short the further useless trial, in order that the remainder of
that "seventieth week" might be spent specially and exclusively upon the people,
the individuals of that cast-off system--before the efforts of the ministers of
the new dispensation should be distributed broadcast to all nations. And it was so; for
our Lord, after his resurrection, when telling his disciples that their efforts need no
longer be confined to Jews only, but might be extended to "all nations," was
particular to add--"beginning at Jerusalem." (`Luke 24:47`)
And he knew well that their Jewish ideas would hinder them from going beyond the Jews
until
::page 171::
he should in due time open the way--as he did at the end of their favor, by sending Peter
to Cornelius. Since that time, individual Jews and Gentiles have shared the privileges of
God's favor equally, both being alike acceptable, in and through Christ; for in the
present call "there is no difference" so far as God is concerned--the difference
unfavorable to the Jew being his own prejudice against accepting, as a gift
through Christ, the blessings once offered him upon condition of his actual compliance
with the full letter and spirit of God's law, which none in the fallen state could fulfil.
That "seventieth week," with all the particulars of the testing of
Fleshly Israel, not only accomplished the purpose of testing that system, but it also and
specially furnished a typical representation of a similar testing of the nominal Gospel
Church or Spiritual Israel, called "Christendom" and "Babylon," during
seven corresponding years, which began the harvest of the Gospel age--the period from
October 1874 to October 1881. "Christendom," "Babylon," professes to
see the failure of its prototype, Fleshly Israel, and claims to be the true spiritual
seed of Abraham, and to be ready, waiting and anxious to convert the heathen world, and to
righteously rule and teach and bless all nations, just as the Jewish system professed. The
present is like the typical age, also, in the fact that the leaders then had generally
come to regard the promises of a coming Messiah as figurative expressions; and only the
commoner class of the people expected a personal Messiah. The learned among the
Jews, then, ignored an individual Messiah, and expected that their church-nation would
triumph over others by reason of its superior laws, and thus fulfil all that the common
people supposed would require a personal Messiah to accomplish. (And this is the view that
is still held by "learned" Jewish teachers, or Rabbis, who interpret the
Messianic
::page 172::
prophecies as applicable to their church-nation, and not to an individual Savior of the
world. Even the prophecies which refer to the sufferings of Christ they apply to their
sufferings as a people.) Carrying out their theory, they were sending missionaries
throughout the world, to convert the world to the Law of Moses, expecting thus to reach
and "bless all the families of the earth," aside from a personal Messiah. To
such an extent was this the case, that our Lord remarked it, saying, "Ye compass sea
and land to make one proselyte."
How similar to this is the theory of nominal "Christendom" today.
The common people, when their attention is drawn to the fact that the Lord promised to
come again, and that the apostles and prophets predicted that the Millennium, or Times of
Restitution, would result from the second coming of the Lord (`Acts 3:19-21`), are
inclined to accept the truth and to rejoice in it, just as a similar class did at the
first advent. But today, as eighteen hundred years ago, the chief priests and rulers of
the people have a more advanced (?) idea. They claim that the promises of Millennial
blessedness, of peace on earth and good will among men, can and must be brought about by
their efforts, missions, etc., without the personal coming of the Lord Jesus; and thus
they make void the promises of the second advent and the coming Kingdom.
The present chief priests and rulers, the "clergy" of
"Christendom," deceiving themselves as well as the people, claim, and seemingly
believe, that their missionary efforts are just about to succeed, and that, without the
Lord, they are now upon the eve of introducing to the world all the Millennial blessings
portrayed in the Scriptures.
The foundation of this delusion lies partly in the fact that the increase of
knowledge and of running to and fro in the earth, incident to this "Day of His
Preparation," have been
::page 173::
specially favorable to the spread of the commerce of civilized nations, and the consequent
increase of worldly prosperity. The credit of all this Babylon coolly appropriates to
herself, pointing out all these advantages as the results of her Christianizing and
energizing influences. She proudly points to the "Christian nation" of Great
Britain, and to her wealth and prosperity, as results of her Christian principles. But
what are the facts? Every step of progress which that nation or any other nation has made
has been only to the extent of the effort exercised to cast off the yoke of Babylon's
oppression. In proportion as Great Britain threw off the fetters of Papal oppression, she
has prospered; and in proportion as she continued to hold and to be influenced by the
Papal doctrines of church and state union, of divinely appointed kingly and priestly
authority and oppression, and to submit to the tyranny of greed and selfishness, to that
extent is she degraded still.
Greed for gold and ambition for power were the energies by which the ports of
heathen lands were reluctantly opened up to the commerce of so-called Christian nations,
to English and German rum and opium, and to American whiskey and tobacco. The love of God
and the blessing of the heathen nations had no place in these efforts. Here is an
apparently small item of current history that ought to startle the consciences of
so-called Christian nations, if they have any. The Mohammedan Emir of Nupe, West Africa,
recently sent the following message to Bishop Crowther, of the Niger mission:
"It is not a long matter; it is about barasa [rum]. Barasa, barasa, barasa! It has ruined our country; it has ruined our people very much; it has made our people mad. I beg you, Malam Kip, don't forget this writing; because we all beg that he [Crowther] should ask the great priests [the committee of the Anglican Church Mission Society] that they
::page 174::
should beg the English Queen [Head of the Church of England] to prevent bringing barasa
into this land.
"For God and the Prophet's sake! For God and the Prophet, his
messenger's sake, he must help us in this matter --that of barasa. Tell him, may God bless
him in his work. This is the mouth word from Malike, the Emir of Nupe."
Commenting on this a Baptist journal remarks:
"This humble negro ruler reveals in this letter a concern for his people which Christian monarchs and governments have not yet reached; for no European Christian ruler, and no President of the United States, has ever yet so appealed in behalf of his people. In all the addresses opening Parliaments, in all the Presidential messages, no such passage has ever been found. All shame to our Christian rulers! Gain, the accursed hunger for gold, is the law with merchants; and these are the darlings and lords of governments."
Then, in the name of truth, we ask, Why call these Christian governments? And the government of the United States is no exception, though so many persist in denominating it a Christian government, while properly it does not recognize the undeserved title, though urged to do so by zealous sectarians. From Boston, vast cargoes of rum are continually sent to Africa, unchecked by the government, and with its full permission, while it grants licenses to tens of thousands to manufacture and deal out to its own citizens the terrible "fire-water," made doubly injurious and seductive by what is called rectifying, that is, by the legalized mixture of the rankest poisons. All this, and much more, is justified and defended by "Christian" statesmen and rulers of so-called Christian nations, for revenue--as the easiest way of collecting from the people a share of the necessary expenses of the government. Surely this is prostitution of the lowest and worst type. Every thinking man must see how out of place is the name Christian, when applied to even the very best of present governments. The attempt to
::page 175::
fit the name Christian to the characters of "the kingdoms of this world," ruled
by the "prince of this world"--Satan-- and imbued with the "spirit of the
world," has perplexed all truly Christian hearts, deluded by this error of supposing
the present governments of the world to be in any sense Christ's Kingdom.
Says Cannon Farrar in the Contemporary Review:
"The old rapacity of the slave-trade has been followed by the greedier and more ruinous rapacity of the drink-seller. Our fathers tore from the neck of Africa a yoke of whips: we have subjected the native races to a yoke of scorpions. We have opened the rivers of Africa to commerce, only to pour down them the raging phlegethon of alcohol, than which no river of the Inferno is more blood-red or accursed. Is the conscience of the nation dead?"
We answer, No! The nation never was Christian, and consequently never had
a Christian conscience or a Christian spirit. The most that can be said of it is,
that the light from God's truly consecrated children has enlightened, refined and shamed
into a measure of moral reform the public sentiment of those nations in which they
"shine as lights."
In like manner a similarly horrid traffic was forced upon China and Japan,
against their earnest protest, by the same Christian (?) governments. In 1840 Great
Britain began a war with China, called the "Opium War," to compel the Chinese
government, which wished to protect its people from that terrible curse, to admit that
article. The war resulted favorably to the devil's side of the question. British warships
destroyed thousands of lives and homes, and forced the heathen Chinese ruler to open the
empire to the slower death of opium--the intoxicant of China. The net revenue of the
British government from this drug, after paying large expenses for collecting the revenue,
amounted, according to official reports published in 1872,
::page 176::
to over $37,000,000 for the preceding year. This, $37,000,000 per year, was the inspiring
cause of that war, the very reverse of love for either the present or future welfare of
the Chinese. The clause in the treaty providing protection to Christian missionaries was
merely a morsel cunningly thrown in to appease the consciences of justice-loving
people--to make a great crime appear to be a mercy, in kindness done. In the treaty at the
end of the war, certain ports were made free to British trade, and similar treaties with
other nations followed, and some good results were thereby secured. One of these was the
opening of China to civilizing influences. But the fact that a few Christian men and women
stepped to the front to teach the people some of the principles of righteousness is not to
be reflected to the credit of the British nation, whose object was trade, and
which, for greed of gold, and not for the good of the Chinese or the glory of God, waged
an unholy and unjust war upon a people not so skilled in the devilish art.
Along with other vices, "Christendom" has taught the nations the
worst form of idolatry, the idolatry of self and wealth and power, for which professedly
Christian men and nations are willing to defraud, to injure and even to kill one another.
It has also taught them blasphemy and sacrilege in every language; for every ship's crew,
from every professedly Christian nation, blasphemes the name of Christ. But, while such
has been the influence of the so-called Christian nations, from their midst have also gone
some noble missionaries of the cross, some real servants of God, and also some less noble,
the servants of men--in all, however, but a mere handful--to tell the heathen about Christ
and real civilization.
It is not the earnest missionaries but the sanguine home officers of
missionary societies, who have little idea of, and often little actual interest in, the
real situation in foreign lands, and whose views are based mainly upon the large
::page 177::
sum annually collected and expended, who think the heathen world almost converted, and
their efforts about to eventuate in the promised Millennial blessings, without the Lord's
second coming. Missionaries who have been to the front confess, generally, to great
discouragement, except when they can stimulate their hope out of all proportion to actual
experience and sound judgment. Thus, one such-- Rev. J. C. R. Ewing, D. D.--who had spent
nine years in mission work in India, in delivering a discourse recently before the Young
Men's Christian Association of Pittsburgh, Pa., admitted that the present effect
of civilization and missionary effort is not only to break down the heathen religions, but
to abolish all religious faith and to make the people infidels. But his strong hope is
that the next step will be from Infidelity to Christianity--an unreasonable hope, surely,
as all experience here, in civilized lands, most certainly proves. We extract from the
public press reports of his discourse, as follows:
"India owes more to the direct and indirect influences of
Christianity than to any other one thing. It has done much to break down the old idea of
material gods, and in its stead to set up the idea of a single supreme God, that the
people of the West [Europe and America] entertain. [A more explicit statement would be
that they are receiving the idea, common to Atheism, that Nature is the supreme and only
God.]
"Among the 263,000,000 of people in that country there are 10,000,000
young men who speak the English language and are instructed in the Western ideas that we
are taught. The higher caste are thoroughly learned in the literature, the religion and
the sciences that are the basis of the education of the people of this country. The old
idea of a vengeful God, who must be propitiated by numerous gifts and many prayers, has
given way to the modern spirit of Infidelity. The educated men of the East no longer
believe in the gods of their fathers. They have abandoned them forever, and replaced them
with the teachings of Colonel Robert G. Ingersoll,
::page 178::
of Paine, of Voltaire, of Bradlaugh and of every other atheistical and pantheistical
teacher. This skeptical age will soon pass away, and the West, just as it has given India
her ideas, will give her the religion of the Christian God.
"The young men of India are well educated, acute observers, intelligent,
well posted in all the affairs of other nations besides their own, and, though it may seem
strange, well acquainted with our Bible. Indeed, they know it so well that none but a man
thoroughly conversant with its teachings, and the Christian theology, could hope to be
able to successfully answer all the objections they bring forward against it. The popular
idea, that a missionary sits in the shade of a tree and teaches naked savages who gather
around him, is an exploded one. In India the missionary meets intelligent and educated
men, and he must be well equipped to influence them. They are, besides being intelligent,
a fine looking people, amiable, courteous, gentlemanly, and treat all foreigners with the
greatest consideration and respect."
The obstinate facts he cites certainly do not warrant the gentleman's
unreasonable hopes. Experience has surely proved that the bungling arguments of
sectarianism, whose errors distort and vitiate what truth they possess, seldom make
converts of either honest or scoffing skeptics. Surely, all but the blind can see that if
the ten hundred millions of heathendom were converted to the condition of the four
hundred millions* of so-called Christendom, the
question would be an open one, as it was in the Jewish age (`Matt. 23:15`), whether they
would not be two-fold more fit for destruction than they were in their original heathen
superstitions. Surely no sane mind could claim that conversion to such a condition as that
of so-called Christendom would fulfil the description of the Millennial peace and good
will, foretold
----------
*Of these 400,000,000, Roman and Greek Catholics together
claim 280,000,000, while Protestants claim 120,000,000.
::page 179::
by the prophets, and briefly summed up in our Lord's prayer, in the words, "Thy
kingdom come; thy will be done on earth, as it is done in heaven." `Luke
11:2`
Is it at all surprising that this mass of four hundred millions,
professedly constituting the Church of Christ, and calling itself his
Kingdom--"Christendom"--is disowned by the Lord, and by him given the more
appropriate name, Babylon (mixture, confusion)? And is it any wonder that with their ideas
of the Kingdom of Christ, and of the manner and results of its spread throughout the
world, these should be unprepared for the real Kingdom, and unwilling to receive the new
King, as, for similar reasons, the rulers of the typical house were unprepared at the
first advent? Nor can it be doubted that those emperors, kings and princes who now use
influence and power chiefly for self-aggrandizement, and who equip and maintain millions
of armed men to protect and to continue them in their imperial extravagances and lordly
positions, would rather see millions slaughtered, and other millions made widows and
orphans, as in the past, than that they should part with their present advantages. Is it
any wonder that these should neither desire, nor expect, nor believe in the kind of
Kingdom promised in the Scriptures?--a kingdom in which the high and lofty and proud shall
be brought low, and the lowly lifted up to the general, proper and designed level? Is it
any wonder that all in sympathy with any kind of oppression, extortion, or grinding
monopoly, by which they obtain, or hope to obtain, unjust advantage over their
fellow-creatures, would be slow to believe in the Kingdom of righteousness in which no
injustice and overreaching will be permitted? Especially, can we wonder that such are slow
to believe this Kingdom nigh, even at the doors?
Nor can we wonder that the great ones, the chief priests and rulers of
"Christendom," looking each to gain from his own quarter or sect (`Isa. 56:11`),
fail to recognize, and therefore
::page 180::
reject, the spiritual King now present, as the teachers of the fleshly house rejected him
when present in the flesh. And as the Lord rejected, cut off and cast away from favor,
into a fire of trouble, many of the "natural branches" of the olive tree,
preserving only the Israelites indeed as branches, do we not see that, in the harvest of
this age, the same wisdom tests the "wild branches" also (`Rom. 11:21,22`), and
cuts off from favor and fatness of the root [the Abrahamic promise] this great mass of
professed branches, whose character and aims and dispositions are foreign and wild indeed
--very different from the promise and plan of God represented in the root?
It is not strange that the present harvest witnesses the separation of true
Christians from mere professors, as in the Jewish harvest a separation of Israelites
indeed from mere professors was accomplished. It is only what we might reasonably have
expected, even had there been no revelation made to us in God's Word, showing the fact of
the rejection of the mass, as Babylon. Compare `Rom. 11:20-22` with `Rev. 3:16; 18:4`.
The rejection of Babylon ("Christendom"), in 1878, was the
rejection of the mass of professors--the "host," as it is termed by Daniel, to
distinguish it from the sanctuary or temple class. The sanctuary class will not be given
up, nor left desolate. No, thank God, the sanctuary is to be glorified; the glory of the
Lord is to fill his temple, when its last living stone is polished and approved and set in
place. (`1 Pet. 2:5,6`) We have seen how such a sanctuary class has existed throughout the
age, how it was defiled, and its precious vessels (doctrines) profaned, and how its
cleansing from error has been gradually effected. This class had all along been the real
Church, even while the nominal systems were still in a measure recognized and to some
extent used. After the rejection of the nominal systems, however,
::page 181::
now as in the Jewish harvest, the real Church or Sanctuary class alone is recognized and
used as God's mouthpiece. Caiaphas, a chief-priest of Fleshly Israel, was used as the
agent of God to deliver a great lesson and prophecy only a few days before that system was
cast off. (See `John 11:50,51,55; 18:14`.) But we have no intimation in the Scriptures,
nor any reason for supposing, that God ever used or recognized that church-nation, its
rulers and representatives, after it was cast off. And this same lesson should be
recognized, here, in connection with Babylon. She is "spewed out" of the Lord's
mouth; and neither the voice of the Bridegroom nor of the bride shall be heard in her
any more forever. `Rev. 18:23`
It is in vain that some attempt to make a plea for their quarter of Babylon,
and, while admitting the general correctness of the prophetic portrait, to claim that
their sect, or their particular congregation, is an exception to the general character of
Babylon, and that, therefore, the Lord cannot be calling upon them to withdraw from it
formally and publicly, as they once joined it.
Let such consider that we are now in the harvest time of separation, and
remember our Lord's expressed reason for calling us out of Babylon, namely, "that ye
be not partakers of her sins." Consider, again, why Babylon is so named. Evidently,
because of her many errors of doctrine, which, mixed with a few elements of divine truth,
make great confusion, and because of the mixed company brought together by the mixed
truths and errors. And since they will hold the errors at a sacrifice of truth, the latter
is made void, and often worse than meaningless. This sin, of holding and teaching error at
the sacrifice of truth is one of which every sect of the Church nominal is guilty, without
exception. Where is the sect which will assist you in diligently searching the Scriptures,
to grow thereby in grace and in the
::page 182::
knowledge of the truth? Where is the sect which will not hinder your growth, both by its
doctrines and its usages? Where is the sect in which you can obey the Master's words and
let your light shine? We know of none.
If any of God's children in these organizations do not realize their bondage,
it is because they do not attempt to use their liberty, because they are asleep at their
posts of duty, when they should be active stewards and faithful watchmen. (`1 Thess.
5:5,6`) Let them wake up and attempt to use the liberty they think they possess; let them
show to their fellow-worshippers wherein their creeds fall short of the divine plan,
wherein they diverge from it and run in direct opposition to it; let them show how Jesus
Christ by the favor of God tasted death for every man; how this fact, and the
blessings flowing from it, shall "in due time" be testified to every man; how in
"the times of refreshing" the blessings of restitution shall flow to the whole
human race. Let them show further the high calling of the Gospel Church, the rigid
conditions of membership in that body, and the special mission of the Gospel age to take
out this peculiar "people for his name," which in due time is to be exalted and
to reign with Christ. Those who will thus attempt to use their liberty to preach the good
tidings in the synagogues of today will succeed either in converting whole congregations,
or else in awakening a storm of opposition. They will surely cast you out of their
synagogues, and separate you from their company, and say all manner of evil against you,
falsely, for Christ's sake. And, in so doing, doubtless, many will feel that they are
doing God service. But, if thus faithful, you will be more than comforted in the precious
promises of `Isaiah 66:5` and `Luke 6:22`--"Hear the word of the Lord, ye that
tremble at his Word: Your brethren that hated you, that cast you out for my
name's sake, said, Let the Lord be glorified [we do this for the Lord's glory]: but he
::page 183::
shall appear to your joy, and they shall be ashamed." "Blessed are ye when men
shall hate you, and when they shall separate you from their company, and shall reproach
you, and cast out your name as evil, for the Son of man's sake. Rejoice ye in that day,
and leap for joy; for, behold, your reward is great in heaven; for in like manner did
their fathers unto the prophets." But, "Woe unto you when all men shall speak
well of you; for so did their fathers to the false prophets."
If all with whom you worship as a congregation are saints--if all are wheat,
with no tares among them--you have met a most remarkable people, who will receive the
harvest truths gladly. But if not, you must expect present truth to separate the tares
from the wheat. And more, you must do your share in presenting these very truths which
will accomplish the separation.
If you would be one of the overcoming saints, you must now be one of the
"reapers" to thrust in the sickle of truth. If faithful to the Lord, worthy of
the truth and worthy of joint-heirship with him in glory, you will rejoice to share with
the Chief Reaper in the present harvest work--no matter how disposed you may be,
naturally, to glide smoothly through the world.
If there are tares among the wheat in the congregation of which you are a
member, as is always the case, much will depend upon which is in the majority. If the
wheat preponderates, the truth, wisely and lovingly presented, will affect them favorably;
and the tares will not long care to stay. But if the majority are tares--as nine-tenths or
more generally are--the effect of the most careful and kind presentation of the harvest
truth will be to awaken bitterness and strong opposition; and, if you persist in declaring
the good tidings, and in exposing the long established errors, you will soon be "cast
out" for the good of the sectarian
::page 184::
cause, or have your liberties so restrained that you cannot let your light shine in that
congregation. Your duty then is plain: Deliver your loving testimony to the goodness and
wisdom of the Lord's great plan of the ages, and, wisely and meekly giving your reasons,
publicly withdraw from them.
There are various degrees of bondage among the different sects of
Babylon--"Christendom." Some who would indignantly resent the utter and absolute
slavery of individual conscience and judgment, required by Romanism, are quite willing to
be bound themselves, and anxious to get others bound, by the creeds and dogmas of one or
another of the Protestant sects. True, their chains are lighter and longer than those of
Rome and the Dark Ages. So far as it goes, this surely is good--reformation truly--a step
in the right direction--toward full liberty--toward the condition of the Church
in the apostolic times. But why wear human shackles at all? Why bind and limit our
consciences at all? Why not stand fast in the full liberty wherewith Christ hath made us
free? Why not reject all the efforts of fallible fellowmen to fetter conscience and hinder
investigation?--not only the efforts of the remote past, of the Dark Ages, but the efforts
of the various reformers of the more recent past? Why not conclude to be as was the
apostolic Church?--free to grow in knowledge as well as in grace and love, as the
Lord's "due time" reveals his gracious plan more and more fully?
Surely all know that whenever they join any of these human organizations,
accepting its Confession of Faith as theirs, they bind themselves to believe
neither more nor less than that creed expresses on the subject. If, in spite of the
bondage thus voluntarily yielded to, they should think for themselves, and receive light
from other sources, in advance of the light enjoyed by the sect they have joined, they
must either prove untrue to the sect and to their covenant with it, to believe nothing
contrary to its Confession, or else they
::page 185::
must honestly cast aside and repudiate the Confession which they have outgrown, and come
out of such a sect. To do this requires grace and costs some effort, disrupting, as it
often does, pleasant associations, and exposing the honest truth-seeker to the silly
charges of being a "traitor" to his sect, a "turncoat," one "not
established," etc. When one joins a sect, his mind is supposed to be given up
entirely to that sect, and henceforth not his own. The sect undertakes to decide for him
what is truth and what is error; and he, to be a true, staunch, faithful member, must
accept the decisions of his sect, future as well as past, on all religious matters,
ignoring his own individual thought, and avoiding personal investigation, lest he grow in
knowledge, and be lost as a member of such sect. This slavery of conscience to a sect and
creed is often stated in so many words, when such a one declares that he "belongs"
to such a sect.
These shackles of sectarianism, so far from being rightly esteemed as
shackles and bonds, are esteemed and worn as ornaments, as badges of respect and marks of
character. So far has the delusion gone, that many of God's children would be ashamed to
be known to be without some such chains--light or heavy in weight, long or short in the
personal liberty granted. They are ashamed to say that they are not in bondage to any sect
or creed, but "belong" to Christ only.
Hence it is that we sometimes see an honest, truth-hungry child of God
gradually progressing from one denomination to another, as a child passes from class to
class in a school. If he be in the Church of Rome, when his eyes are opened, he gets out
of it, probably falling into some branch of the Methodist or Presbyterian systems. If here
his desire for truth be not entirely quenched and his spiritual senses stupefied with the
spirit of the world, you may a few years after find him in some of the branches of the
Baptist
::page 186::
system; and, if he still continues to grow in grace and knowledge and love of truth, and
into an appreciation of the liberty wherewith Christ makes free, you may by and by find
him outside of all human organizations, joined merely to the Lord and to his saints, bound
only by the tender but strong ties of love and truth, like the early Church. `1 Cor.
6:15,17`; `Eph. 4:15,16`
The feeling of uneasiness and insecurity, if not bound by the chains of some
sect, is general. It is begotten of the false idea, first promulgated by Papacy, that
membership in an earthly organization is essential, pleasing to the Lord and necessary to
everlasting life. These earthly, humanly organized systems, so different from the simple,
unfettered associations of the days of the apostles, are viewed involuntarily and
almost unconsciously by Christian people as so many Heaven Insurance Companies, to some
one of which money, time, respect, etc., must be paid regularly, to secure
heavenly rest and peace after death. Acting on this false idea, people are almost as
nervously anxious to be bound by another sect, if they step out of one, as they are if
their policy of insurance has expired, to have it renewed in some respectable company.
But no earthly organization can grant a passport to heavenly glory. The most
bigoted sectarian (aside from the Romanist) will not claim, even, that membership in his
sect will secure heavenly glory. All are forced to admit that the true Church is the one
whose record is kept in heaven, and not on earth. They deceive the people by claiming that
it is needful to come to Christ through them--needful to become members
of some sectarian body in order to become members of "the body of Christ," the
true Church. On the contrary, the Lord, while he has not refused any who came to him
through sectarianism, and has turned no true seeker
::page 187::
away empty, tells us that we need no such hindrances, but could much better have come to
him direct. He cries, "Come unto me"; "take my yoke upon you, and
learn of me"; "my yoke is easy and my burden is light, and ye shall find rest to
your souls." Would that we had given heed to his voice sooner. We would have avoided
many of the heavy burdens of sectism, many of its bogs of despair, many of its doubting
castles, its vanity fairs, its lions of worldly-mindedness, etc.
Many, however, born in the various sects, or transplanted in infancy or
childhood, without questioning the systems, have grown free in heart, and unconsciously
beyond the limits and bounds of the creeds they acknowledge by their profession and
support with their means and influence. Few of these have recognized the advantages of
full liberty, or the drawbacks of sectarian bondage. Nor was the full, complete separation
enjoined until now, in the harvest time. Now the Lord's words are heard, Come out from
among them: be ye clean (free, both from wrong practices and from false doctrines), ye who
bear the vessels (truths-- doctrines) of the Lord. `Isa. 52:11`
Now the ax is laid to the root of the nominal Christian system--Babylon,
"Christendom"--as it was to the nominal Jewish system at the first advent; and
the great system in which the "fowl of heaven" delight to roost, and which they
have grievously befouled (`Luke 13:18,19`), and which has in fact become "a cage of
every unclean and hateful bird" (`Rev. 18:2`), is to be hewn down, and shall deceive
the world no longer. Instead, the true olive tree, whose roots are the true promises of
God, and whose branches are the truly and fully consecrated and faithful ones of this
Gospel age, whose names are "written in heaven," will be seen to be the
true and only joint-heir and Bride of the Lamb. `Rev. 17:14`
::page 188::
The Testing and Sifting of the Sanctuary Class
Though coming out of Babylon is one step, and a long one, in the direction of complete overcoming, it is by no means the last one; and we should be careful to guard against a disposition to rest after every advance step of the way.
"Ne'er think the victory won,
Nor once at ease sit down:
Thine arduous work will not be done
Till thou hast gained thy crown.
"A cloud of witnesses around
Hold thee in full survey.
Forget the steps already trod,
And onward urge thy way."
The step out of Babylon has generally been preceded by other steps of
obedience, which in turn have exercised and strengthened the character for subsequent
conflicts and victories. And it will be followed by various other tests and opportunities
for overcoming, in view of which Paul (`Gal. 5:1`) wrote, "Stand fast in the liberty
wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with a yoke of
bondage." Every one who comes to realize the liberty of the sons of God and full
freedom from Babylon's bondage should expect to meet other attempts of the great adversary
to bring him into other bondages, or to stumble him. The Lord permits these severe
testings, that the class now sought may be manifested, and prepared for his service in the
Kingdom of glory.
An illustration of this testing and sifting took place in the Jewish harvest,
foreshadowing what we may expect here. The temple or sanctuary class at the first advent
was represented by the Lord's disciples, of whom he said, "Ye are clean, but not all
[of you]"; and following the casting off of nominal Israel (A.D. 33) came a severe
testing to those representing God's temple, the clean and the unclean, to separate
::page 189::
them. Peter was sifted, and almost failed (`Luke 22:31`; `Matt. 26:74,75`; `John
21:15-17`); but, being "clean," true at heart, he was enabled to come off
victorious. Judas also was tested, and he proved to be unclean, willing to sell the truth
for earthly advantage, to deny the Lord for money, even while kissing him in profession of
love.
Just so there is here, in this harvest, a cleansed sanctuary, and, closely
associated with it, some who are not clean. And since the casting off of Babylon in 1878,
and the call there made, to come out of her, a testing and sifting work has been going on
amongst those who have come out. Doubtless Peter and Judas were illustrations of similar
classes here, among those who have come out of Babylon, and who have been cleansed from
many of her doctrinal pollutions-- a class which remains faithful to the Lord and the
truth, and another class which proves unfaithful, which does not follow on to know the
Lord, but which turns aside to evil and false doctrines, often worse than those from which
they had escaped.
This testing and sifting of the temple class, in this harvest since 1878,
were foreshadowed by our Lord's typical act of cleansing the typical temple after assuming
the office of King and pronouncing judgment against the nominal Jewish church. After
declaring their house left unto them desolate, he proceeded to the temple in Jerusalem,
typical of the true temple or sanctuary, and, making a scourge of small cords, he used it
in driving out the money changers; and he overturned the tables of them that sold doves.
The scourge of small cords used in that typical act represented the various
truths, used in the present harvest among the temple class, to correct and prove, and to
separate the unclean. The truths now made manifest reveal so clearly the perfect will of
God, the import of full consecration to his service, and the narrowness of the way which
must be traveled
::page 190::
by those who walk in the Master's footprints, that those who have joined themselves to
this class from any unclean motives are continually scourged by the truth, until
constrained to separate themselves from the sanctuary class.
Though several of our Lord's parables show the general separation of the
"sanctuary" class from the "host," or general mass of professing
Christendom, there are two which go still further and show the testing and sifting,
afterward, of the sanctuary class--the separation of the overcomers, who shall inherit the
Kingdom (`Rev. 3:21`), from others of the honestly consecrated, who, overcome by the
spirit of the world, neglect to sacrifice present advantages and honors of men, for the
higher honors of God.
The parable of the Ten Virgins, while it shows the entire virgin or
consecrated class being separated from Babylon, marks distinctly a testing and separation
to take place in this class also--a separation of wise virgins, full of faith and
fervent love and the spirit of prompt obedience, from foolish virgins,
who allow their first love and fervency of spirit to cool, and their faith and promptness
of obedience consequently to abate. The wise, living in full harmony with their covenant
of entire consecration to God, and earnestly watching for the Lord's promised return, are
prepared to appreciate the glad harvest message, to recognize the foretold indications of
the Master's presence, and to stand whatever tests he may see fit to apply, to prove their
loyalty and faithfulness. These, awake and watching, hear the Master's knock, through the
words of the prophets, announcing his presence; and to them present losses and crosses,
meekly borne for the truth's sake, are welcomed as the harbingers of a more lasting peace
and joy and glory and blessing to follow.
When the knock of prophecy was heard announcing the
::page 191::
Lord's presence in the autumn of 1874, almost immediately it began to be recognized; and
quickly the cry was raised, "Behold the Bridegroom! go ye out to meet him." And
this cry still goes forth, and will continue until all of the consecrated virgin class
have heard, and have had their faith and loyalty tested by it. The wise, with
lamps (the Word of God) trimmed and burning, and with oil (the holy spirit) in their
vessels (their hearts), will all recognize the Lord's presence; and, by ordering their
conduct and affairs in harmony with their faith, they will go "forth" to meet
the beloved Bridegroom, and sit down with him at the marriage feast.
The marriage custom of the Jews formed a beautiful illustration of the
Church's betrothal and marriage with Christ, her Lord. The espousal or betrothal was a
formal agreement made with solemn covenants of fidelity on each side. The woman continued
in her father's house until she was taken to the home of her husband, usually about a year
after betrothal or marriage. The consummation of the union consisted in the receiving of
the wife to the home prepared for her by the husband, and was celebrated with a great
feast lasting several days--called the Nuptial Feast. At a fixed hour the bridegroom set
out for his bride, who was waiting in readiness to receive him and to accompany him to
their future home and to the feast which he had provided, followed by her virgin
companions with lamps and all the necessary preparations.
In the parable no mention is made of the bride, but all of the "wise
virgins" are mentioned as those for whom the Bridegroom comes, and who accompany him
and enter to the feast of joys prepared. And this is both proper and necessary; because
the Bride of Christ is composed of many members or persons, most beautifully represented
in the wise virgins. The foolish virgins who obtain the light and
::page 192::
experience later, but who will fail to obtain the high exaltation of the "wise,"
faithful Bride class, will no doubt be the class mentioned (`Psa. 45:14,15`) as "the
virgins her companions which follow her," who in due time will be favored,
but not so highly, by the King.
The attitude of the wise virgins, ready, waiting and anxious for the
Bridegroom's coming, fitly represents the only proper attitude of the Lord's
betrothed, the truly consecrated Church. For a bride to neglect or to be unprepared for
this, the most eventful moment of life, would prove her unfitness for the honor; and so it
is with the Church: "He that hath this hope in him purifieth himself," seeks to
be in an attitude of heart and life pleasing to the Bridegroom, and is longing and waiting
for the blessed union and feast promised by him who said, I go to prepare a place for you,
and will come again and receive you unto myself.
Two things are evident from this parable: first, that this special feature of
truth (the knowledge of the Bridegroom's presence) is not intended for the world in
general, nor for the nominal church in general, but only for the virgin or consecrated
class; second, it is evident that this message of the Bridegroom's presence will cause the
separation which will test and prove each individual of the virgin class and clearly
manifest the wise, faithful, worthy ones from the unfaithful, unwise virgins.
Oh, what riches of grace are contained in this glorious message, "Behold
the Bridegroom!" As yet it is a great secret known only among the saints; for the
world cannot receive it. It is foolishness unto them, and will be, until the virgins have
all heard, and the wise among them have fully entered in; until "the door is
shut," and the "flaming fire" of the great time of trouble then to ensue
will cause every eye to see (recognize) the Lord's presence and reign begun.
With what kingly grace the message of Jehovah comes to
::page 193::
his humble servants and handmaidens--"Hearken, O daughter, and consider, and incline
thine ear; forget also thine own people and thy father's [Adam's] house [the human
relationships, hopes, aims and ambitions]; so shall the King [the Lord Jesus] greatly
desire thy beauty: for he is thy Lord; and worship thou him." (`Psa. 45:10,11`) And
who are these who will receive such favor? They are the "called, and
accepted, and faithful." "The King's daughter [Jehovah's daughter; for as
such the Bride of Christ is owned] is all glorious within." Her beauty is
the beauty of holiness. Outwardly, before the world, she is not glorious; and, like her
Lord in his humiliation, she is despised and rejected of men. But she will not always be
so: having followed him in his humiliation, she shall also share in his glory. As a new
creature, she will in due time be clothed with his divine nature-- "Her clothing
[when glorified] is of wrought gold"--gold being a symbol of the divine nature.
"She shall be brought unto the king in raiment of needle work"--in the simple
white robe of her Lord's own furnishing, the robe of his righteousness, upon which she
will have wrought, with much carefulness, the beautiful adornments of the Christian
graces. And great will be the rejoicing in heaven and in earth at her abundant entrance
into the King's palace (`2 Pet. 1:5-8,11`): many will say, "Let us be glad and
rejoice and give honor to him; for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath
made herself ready." (`Rev. 19:7`) "And the daughter of Tyre [the strong ones of
earth] shall be there with a gift; even the rich among the people shall entreat thy
favor....I will make thy name to be remembered in all generations: therefore shall the
people praise thee forever and ever." `Psa. 45:12-17`
Truly "wise" will those of the consecrated prove to be who,
neglecting worldly enchantments, and earthly hopes and prizes, and with hearts yearning
and waiting for the
::page 194::
Beloved, are found ready and proved worthy of the great exaltation promised, as the Bride,
the Lamb's wife.
"Bride of the Lamb, thy charms,
Oh, may we share."
Since taking their lamps and following the Bridegroom represents leaving
all else to follow Christ in this time of his presence, it is equivalent to leaving
Babylon, where the virgins have mainly been; because the truth manifested in the light of
harvest clearly indicates this separation of wheat from tares. Careful trimming reveals
this fact to the wise virgins possessing the holy spirit of consecration and obedience.
Such as have this "oil" will have the light also; and such, appreciating the
privilege, will gladly and promptly "follow the Lamb whithersoever he goeth."
The foolish virgins, on the contrary, lacking sufficiency of oil, fail to get
clear light on the subject of the Bridegroom's presence; and, being overcharged with the
cares, plans, etc., of the present life, they fail to investigate the subject fully, and
consequently are halting and undecided about leaving Babylon, and are measurably
indifferent to, and incredulous of, the whole subject. And even if, urged by others, they
reluctantly take their departure, like Lot's wife, they are constantly inclined to look
back. For such the Lord left the injunction, "Remember Lot's wife." (`Luke
17:32`) And again he said, "No man having put his hand to the plow, and looking back,
is fit for the Kingdom of God.
There is nothing in the parable to indicate that the foolish virgins will be
aware of their foolishness, until the opportunity of going in to the feast has passed by.
Then they will realize how foolish they were in expecting to be owned of the Lord as his
Bride and joint-heirs, when they were at most but lukewarm and distant followers. Many now
"highly esteemed among men," and noted for their "wonderful works,"
will be among the disappointed.
::page 195::
And the Door was Shut
The proclamation of the Bridegroom's presence, the going forth to meet
him, and the entering in with him to the marriage, still continue, and will
continue, until all the wise virgins are "sealed in their foreheads" with a
knowledge of harvest truth sufficient to separate them from Babylon, and to enable them to
enter in with the Bridegroom to the feast prepared. Then, when all the virgins have been
tested by this present truth, the door of opportunity will be shut, and no more will be
permitted to enter to the feast; for, said the Master, I am "he that openeth, and no
man shutteth, and shutteth and no man openeth." (`Rev. 3:7`) And when the foolish
virgins come knocking and seeking admittance, after the door is shut, saying "Master,
Master, open it for us," he will answer them, saying, "Indeed, I say unto you, I
recognize you not." Those who are ashamed of him and of his words now, and therefore
indifferent to them, of such will he then be ashamed, when he is about to appear in glory
and power with all his holy, faithful messengers--the wise virgins exalted and glorified
with him.
The shut door, it will be perceived, has nothing whatever to do with the
worldly. It is the door to the marriage feast; and it never was open to any except the
consecrated, the virgin class. No other class was ever invited to enter it; and it closes
when the harvest truths have sifted and separated all the warm, earnest covenant-keepers
from the cold, lukewarm and overcharged, who neglect to fulfil their covenant. Thank God,
it is not the door of mercy that here closes, nor even the door of all favor; but it is
the door to that one chief favor of joint-heirship with Christ as his Bride. But
when it closes against the foolish virgins, and will never again open to their knock,
though it leave them standing without, exposed to the great tribulation of the "evil
day," where there will be weeping and wailing and gnashing of
::page 196::
teeth, it still leaves them in the arms of God's love and mercy, and even under his favor
and special care; for the great tribulations through which they shall pass are designed to
purify and purge those then repentant virgins, and thereby to fit them as vessels of honor
for the Master's use, though not for the chief honor to which they were originally called,
but of which they proved themselves unworthy. Partaking to some extent of the spirit of
Babylon, giving to her the weight of their influence, however small, they are reckoned of
God as partakers of her sins and therefore as unworthy to escape the plagues coming upon
her. These plagues are necessary, not only for Babylon's destruction, but also for the
purification and separation of th